|
4.1 / 5
|
ADD YOUR COMMENT:
|
|
Name:
|
|
Comment:
|
|
|
Comments: 12 | ||
yuzzo | 2023.05.25 23:21 | nice game |
yuzzo | 2023.05.25 23:21 | are the very good game iwant to play |
Salomon | 2020.07.17 22:29 | Nice boobs |
solomon | 2019.08.04 11:06 | got two 64s, but it stops and does not allow to merge second pair of 32s |
JakeJones | 2019.07.24 00:08 | got 64 on 6 pieces |
DOD | 2019.05.27 21:59 | 64 first time. whats the problem? |
got | 2019.05.15 23:04 | 32 OK, 64 with a lot of trial and luck |
wh | 2019.05.12 08:32 | 32 is easy 64 is haard |
Dan | 2019.05.10 05:14 | A very minor bug at least on my system, while pyramids with empty sides move I can see the number 0 on those sides. I will also say that a good way to do beat this game is to set it up so that you will be able to align two sides of 32, when there is only one empty space left. |
Dan | 2019.05.10 03:47 | Seemingly complex but I managed to win on first try. So why 64? I think there is two reasons. One, because it is hard enough but fair, and two, because there are 64 pyramid sides on a full board. Also, I had the opportunity to find out that you get at least one more chance to merge something once the board is full, as long as all the sides arent full, which is good. Its also good that all equal values of contacting sides merge, regardless of where you click on the pyramid. |
Dudeley | 2019.05.09 04:57 | There is no way to even clome CLOSE to winning this. good luck getting past 16 |
Dudeley | 2019.05.09 04:49 | Honestly, what do you want from me?! |